Wednesday, 17 June 2015

Two unions, transit and outside workers, do mediation on the 29th - are in a position to strike on July 2nd

 http://www.burlingtongazette.ca/?p=39493

Two unions, transit and outside workers, do mediation on the 29th - are in a position to strike on July 2nd

By Pepper Parr
BURLINGTON, ON

The labour picture in Burlington is getting that cloudy look.

Two CUPE locals have passed the “no board report” point and are now moving on to mediation which will take place June 29th.

If they can’t settle with the city at mediation they can go on strike July 2nd.

The view among many was that the outside workers would find a way to settle with the city but the transit workers are very far apart – strike is quite likely with the bus drivers.
There was a time when a much larger bus termial existed 25 yards to the left of this small terminal onm John Street - it was where people met.  There were fewer cars, Burlington didn't have the wealth then that it has now.  We were a smaller city, as much rural as suburban.  The times have changed and transit now needs to change as well.
The sign in the window might not say open for parts of July.
The unions have one issue which they both want to see some movement on – workers over 65 do not get health and welfare benefits – even though it is apparently written into the collective agreement.

Burlington has never paid those benefits to people over 65 and is apparently now taking the position that not paying the health and welfare benefits is a past practice and does not have to be paid.

The unions claim they have served a legal notice on the city and want the benefit, as it is written into the collective agreement, paid.

The size of the health and welfare package is lower for the outside workers than it is for other union locals, according to the union.

It sounds as if the outside workers are going to use the howl that will come from the public if the pools and splash pads are shut down for July to make their point.

City Council has standing Committee meetings on the 6th, 7th and 8th of July – so they can’t just leave town. If the Outside workers strike – do the Inside workers respect the picket lines?
 
Wages are the issue for the transit workers. The union claims that Burlington transit drivers earn $7 an hour less than those in Hamilton and $3 an hour less than those in Oakville.
Xcelsior BUS 009 FRONT VIEW
This bus might stay in the garage for part of July – and not because it is out of gas.
Putting money into transit is a hard sell in this city.

21 comments to Two unions, transit and outside workers, do mediation on the 29th – are in a position to strike on July 2nd

  • Susan Lewis
    Burlington Transit workers’ contracts expired more than a year ago.
    “Union spokesman Dean Mainville argues that the employees are being compensated poorly when compared to counterparts in neighbouring municipalities, like Oakville and Hamilton.” and “Talks will resume on June 29, in advance of a legal strike or lockout date of July 2.” http://www.900chml.com/2015/06/16/37699/
    If there was a strike, it would include the Handi-Van services as well. Burlington City Councillors, how could you?
    Susan Lewis
  • John
    We are not Hamilton and we are not Oakville, using these cities as a reason for a pay increase is ridiculous.
    If the transit workers want to apply for jobs there to increase their wages the have the option.
    Does anyone in our local government ask these workers what they plan to add to their services to earn a wage increase.
    You don’t get an increase for just showing up !
    • Jody
      What is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.
      I don’t take the bus so can’t comment on transit but the men and women who keep our streets & public spaces clean and maintained must do more then show up. Take a good look at other cities and reflect back to ours. Sure it’s not absolutely perfect but to me looks clean and maintained. I’ve called in complaints and the service turnaround is reasonable. I’ve lived in other municipalities that took months for someone to show up. I also recall the ice storm 2 years ago seeing staff working Christmas Eve, Christmas Day and Boxing Day opening roads and removing limbs and trees form roads and sidewalks. I’m sure it was voluntary to come in and they choose to serve us over important holiday time with their loved ones.
      I do think wages for similar work in the GTA should be used as a benchmark. Seems to work for the Sunshine club at City Hall?
      From 2012 Inside Halton Story
      “The non-unionized salaries, which are approved by council, are based on other municipalities, according to Roy Male, executive director of human resources
      Nine city staff made between $150,000 and $200,000, with the top earners in this bracket being Kim Phillips, general manager of community services at $191,808, with $8,905 in taxable benefits; Roy Male, executive director of human resources, at $182,435 and $969 in taxable benefits, and Allan Magi, executive director of corporate strategic initiatives at $172,529, with $945 in taxable benefits.”
      http://www.insidehalton.com/news-story/2909593-mayor-weighs-in-on-sunshine-list/http://www.insidehalton.com/news-story/2909593-mayor-weighs-in-on-sunshine-list/
  • stevewinter
    I FEEL THAT BUS DRIVERS SHOULD SUCK IT UP AND MOVE ON they should think of the passegers on the bus and get over it
  • James
    I am so #&$%*#% tired of hearing about public sector unions threatening to go on strike because their workers lives are so rough, even though their wages, benefits, sick days and vacation days far exceed the private sector workers who are paying their salaries.
    Don’t like your job? Quit. Think you should be paid more for picking up garbage or driving a bus, well I’m sorry, you should have thought about that when you were skipping classes in high school. That was your decision, not ours. You knew what the job paid when you took it. If that’s not good enough for you now then go find something else that pays more. That’s on you, not us.
    Without a blink of an eye I’d fire each and every union member who so much as thought about going on strike. Do they not realize there is a line forming of people that would replace them, and most likely do their jobs better? Great salaries and smaller workloads… what’s not to like?
    This union mentality is killing us, and the worst part is the union members are so bloody brainwashed into believing the union propaganda, they don’t even realize it. It’s time to abolish these self-serving and entitlement-minded unions once and for all!!
    I’m sorry public sector, but we just can’t afford to keep elevating your remuneration and lifestyle at the expense of ours, when you’re already so far ahead. But you don’t get that… do you?
  • B Carlton
    John, unfortunately this has been the way of negotiating with our public unions specifically Police EMS and Fire. The government of the time always caves in. That’s why this province is bankrupt.
    The province doesn’t have the money…..FYI teachers.
    • John
      B, absolutely correct, UNFORTUNATE.
      Perhaps this council and mayor could find the courage to be pioneers and reverse the status quo.
      If not they should be considered average and not suitable for reselection and certainly not for advancement.
      As for the province, teachers and their union, not so long ago they went out on an illegal strike.
      When they did Mike Harris (love him or hate him) set a very important precedent.
      He sent out the saving to parents with children in school at the time.
      Unfortunately for him he did not remember that all tax payers contributed to the education costs and did not reimburse those without children. Effectively making the education tax a user fee.
      If our municipal unions can’t find reason in their demands maybe a tax credit for all would ease the pain for the loss of service.
  • Susan Lewis
    John, or whomever you are, I think most of us are aware that Burlington is not Hamilton or Oakville. However, Oakville is an excellent comparison because their population is only 6,000 higher than ours.
    Actually, when it comes to government, some do get a raise for just showing up. An example would be our elected City Councillors: Jan. 25, 2012 “With all the unionized workers working for the City of Burlington having settled their contracts, with a reasonable increase in their salaries of 1.5 per cent, 1.9 per cent and 1.9 per cent each year in a three-year contract, it is with awe that I heard councillors increase their salary by 3.2 per cent … while non-unionized staff were held to zero per cent and the unionized workers were reasonable in their demands.” http://m.insidehalton.com/opinion-story/2895738-cupe-upset-with-councilhttp://m.insidehalton.com/opinion-story/2895738-cupe-upset-with-council Most people in Canada also get a raise for “just showing up”, it’s referred to as a cost of living increase. Even C.P.P. gets a cost of living increase and no seniors are asked to show up anywhere.
    As far as service is concerned, people who use the system have been rating our drivers as the best they have ever encountered anywhere.”
    • James
      “Most people in Canada also get a raise for “just showing up””?? I don’t think so, not anymore. That cost of living increase is no longer guaranteed in the private sector. I don’t get a cost of living increase, and most people I know don’t get a cost of living increase. We get a salary, and unless we ask for a raise or change employers, we stay at that salary. I know a woman who has not gotten a pay increase in over 12 years. I’m not saying it’s right, but that’s the reality in the private sector. That’s why it’s so frustrating to have to listen to whiny public sector union workers complain that they’re not getting enough, when they already get more than us for doing less work. They have no idea how good they’ve got it. Seriously. Can you imagine one of those entitled public sector workers joining the public sector, with less pay, less vacation, less sick days, less benefits and more hours? They’d learn to shut their mouths and appreciate what they’ve already got pretty darn quick!
  • Roger
    The people who work in the public sector are welcome to leave – they will find that the private sector has become a cold place.
    Excellent pension, pay incentives, training
    To the members in the union – you do an excellent job for the city however if you consider your condition unacceptable – nobody is forcing you to stay
    PLEASE LEAVE AND QUICKLY AND NOW – RIGHT NOW
    As their will be 5 people lining up for every new position that open and by the way they will be well qualified and ready to work
  • Former Ward 3
    John, your comments are very insensitive. I do not understand the comment about not making comparisons. We live in a capitalistic society where organizations need to understand their worth through the people, their skills and the job they perform. The City of Burlington is like any business, public or private. We did not get to where we are as a community simply by cutting costs by driving down wages against the rate of inflation. Your job is to identify what this city needs today and 10 years from today. It is the job of the city manager to look at staff resources and find opportunities to be as efficient as possible.
    There is an expectation that comes with any position. If a man makes a dollar today that same job in 10 years should afford that person the same goods and services with enough in his pocket to pay for it. That is a dignity that ALL Canadians regardless of job should expect in this country. That should be YOUR goal if you want this Burlington to remain a vibrant place to work and live. It appears your are prepared to settle for second best and race to the bottom for the sake of votes.
    • John
      Former Ward 3, If you tell me what you don’t understand about comparisons I will try to explain.
      The capitalist society we live in is revolving faster each day.
      The notion of doing the same thing for 10 years without skill or service improvements and expecting the same standard of living has long past.
      Unionized workers have been giving concessions for years recognizing that business can no longer compete with current wages and benefits in Canada. In some businesses wages for new employees will never reach current levels.
      Like any business the city of Burlington is slowly recognizing that they can no longer simply raise taxes to pay for excessive costs.
      Expectations are a funny thing, the more you have the more often you are disappointed.
  • Centerline
    Let them walk.
  • Mary H.
    I’m thinking JAMES works in a factory, those words sounds like factory words to me.
    • James
      What does that even mean? I don’t by the way, I work in a non-unionized private sector office, but please, explain your point.
      As for unionized factory workers, I take the same position. Present day unions are in the business of making the union leaders money. Plain and simple. Happy workers are not good business for unions. Happy workers may eventually question why they are giving money to these leaders, which is why these leaders fill the union members heads with misleading propaganda that makes them believe they are being treated unfairly, and that they need these leaders to fight for their rights. It’s a relationship that has worked very well for union leaders for a very long time. Unfortunately the economy has changed over time, as has the increased sense of entitlement, which has lead us to where we are today. One union after the other threatening strikes, killing the Canadian economy even further, making foreign workers look more and more attractive each day. These unions aren’t protecting Canadians, they’re pricing us out of the market. It’s just a matter of time before this all comes crashing down. The union leaders will have made their money. The unemployed union members will be left scratching their heads, wondering where that pension money went that they were promised.
  • Brenda Craig
    To: Burlington’s City Manager &
    Burlington’s Director of Transit
    DO WHATEVER IT TAKES TO STOP A TRANSIT STRIKE IN BURLINGTON!
    Give the transit driver’s what they so rightfully DESERVE!
    Think of the people who rely on transit as their only means
    to get around our city. Such as people with mobility issues
    who use our Handi-Van services. Seniors who live independently who do not have families to drive them to medical appointments, groceries etc. Think of the people who want to go to the Pan Am Games they need Burlington Transit running to connect to other transit systems to get there. Think of all the essential workers in our city who use transit to get to work, such as nurses for example. I spoke to one today. She doesn’t know what she is going to do if there is a transit strike. We cannot all afford taxi’s, and for some us there is no chance of carpooling with anyone. WHAT DO WE ALL DO THEN HITCHHIKE! What about the safety factor doing that with total strangers.
    Think of all the worker’s who help our economy grow in our city and need transit to get to work and home again. I am a senior with no family, no car and due to health issues do not have “walking” as a backup to get around.
    PLEASE DO NOT LET THIS HAPPEN IN OUR CITY.
    IT WILL BE A DISGRACE TO THOSE INVOLVED WHO HAVE THE POWER
    TO STOP IT AND DON’T.
    • James
      Really? Really?
      No disrespect to bus drivers, but considering the job that they do for an underperforming and underutilized transit system, the fact that they’re making more than minimum wage is a victory for them as it is. Everyone should make enough money to live on, but let’s be honest for a moment, not all jobs warrant higher salaries. They didn’t go to university for 4 years or more to drive laps in a bus.
      “Deserve” is an interesting word. It suggests you’re entitled to something, or that someone owes you something. The world doesn’t work like that anymore.
      Union propaganda has a tendency to elevate union members’ status in their own minds such that they feel they deserve more than they’re worth. Those of us not under the union’s spell know better. Bus drivers don’t deserve to be paid the same as skilled professionals, I’m sorry, but they just don’t. If we give in to their demands now, in a few years and we’ll be right back where we are, watching them put their hands out again asking for more. It never ends. Giving in to their demands is a mistake. They’ll never be satisfied, because the union leadership will see to that. Their job is to maintain a constant state of unrest.
      “Do whatever it takes.” “Give the drivers what they rightfully deserve”??? I say they’re already getting what they rightfully deserve. They knew what the job paid before they accepted the position. They chose to take it. If they want more money for doing the same job, I cannot support that. If they want to walk out on their jobs, let them. Then the very next day, let’s hire new bus drivers who would gladly relieve them of their salaries and benefits.
      It’s time to put a stop to these unions taking the public hostage by threatening strikes and work stoppages. If they want to walk, let them walk, but let’s stop playing games. Walking out on your public sector job should have the same consequences as walking out of your private sector job. Don’t be surprised if when you return, your belongings are waiting for you in a box by the front door, and someone else is sitting at your old desk. Sadly, the public sector unions know this won’t happen. They have no consequences. They are untouchable, and they know it. That’s why it’s wrong. The public needs to stand up against it, not roll over.
  • Susan Lewis
    I do realize that union bashing is in fashion right now so this will be my last comment on the matter. By the way, I most certainly do not support all unions but I do support this one.
    Personally, I consider Big Business Lobbyists to be the most powerful and costly unions in Canada and a more serious threat to our economy than the working class unions. They’re the ones we should be angry with, not our workers unions. I’m talking about lobbyists like the Big Banks such as The Royal Bank of Canada, and the multinationals like Suncor. But, it would appear that people seem to find it easier to turn on each other rather than go after big business. Maybe that’s why Occupy Wall Street fizzled out even though it started due to the greed and criminal acts of some of the .1%’ers.
    My point is, I see so much anger directed at our workers unions and very little said against Big Business and Multinational Corporate Lobbyists in the media.
    I disagree that the answer is to ask our politicians to lower more people’s wages. In Canada, we did get rid of a lot of worker’s unions after the Free Trade deals were signed. I don’t think our economy or the number of good jobs available has improved since then. I do hear a lot of talk lately about the disappearing middle class though.
    In Burlington, as per the current collective agreement, a transit driver starts at $12.65 per hour. In 2012, according to Community Development Halton, the living wage for Halton was $17.05 /hour. Bear in mind that a transit driver has split shifts and less than full-time hours for many years after being hired. Also, please keep in mind that a lot of your neighbours may belong to, or have belonged to a union in the past.
    I also believe that most of the money the City of Burlington employees earn would be spent in Burlington thereby benefiting all of us.
    First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out —
    Because I was not a Socialist.
    Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out —
    Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
    Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out —
    Because I was not a Jew.
    Then they came for me — and there was no one left to speak for me.
    Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984)
  • Jody
    Holy hostile. Workers are asking for a raise and some people think they should quit? Others believe the outside workers do nothing for the taxpayers of this great city.
    So sad. Some people spew the same old rhetoric. If it’s not city workers to hate on it’s teachers. If not teachers it’s nurses. If not nurses it autoworkers and so on. The very people that live, work, play and SPEND their money in the community. The Gazette reads more like the Toronto Sun everyday.
  • Irene K.
    @ James and Public I can’t believe how disrespectful some people are. Burlington Transit Driver’s are the Best Driver’s Ever…. I Take the Burlington Buses as well as buses in other cities and they do more then is expected of them. They not only care about us as passenger’s, but you can tell they care for the city of Burlington. WE NEED BURLINGTON TRANSIT just as we need every other transit system. Who can afford Taxi’s everyday back and forth from work or just getting from one place to the next? I can’t and i’m sure there’s other people that feel the same way. We need Our Transit System and our Taxi’s and cars like every other city so not just people of Burlington can get around, but visitor’s from other cities and towns can come visit too. Burlington’s City Manager & Burlington’s Director of Transit, Do You want your city to be the Best? Then Care of the people that live in this City…Our City. Taking Our City Buses not only helps us get to work and to our destinations, but also helps us socially interact with people in our city and people from others cities and countries.
    Think about HOW and WHO this effects… just do what you have to do to keep our city running. WE NEED OUR BURLINGTON TRANSIT DRIVER’S to keep us moving.
    I’ve been taking the city bus for 26 years and they have not failed me yet. You the Director’s and Manager’s are by not Thinking about how this Strike will effect not only your city, but all other cities around us. So Sad over something So minuscule. Why is this taking so long?
    • HELP KEEP OUR CITY RUNNING!
      • James
        I’m sure Burlington Transit drivers are all wonderful people, I have no disrespect for them whatsoever. But how is paying them more than the job is worth going to make Burlington a better city? A strong transit system is a must, but not at all costs. The Burlington public already pays high taxes, and it’s going to climb sharply in the coming years due to unrelated circumstances. Burlington is quickly becoming an unaffordable city to live in. Higher transit fees isn’t going to help that. If we over-pay the transit drivers, we’ll have to over-pay the other public sector workers as well. In fact many would say we’re already there. It’s just not good business. It’s not sustainable.
    • John
      Jody,
      Our mayor gave a State Of The City Address in Feb. of 2015 in which he asked, how do we define Burlington.
      He also stated, and I quote,
      I our case, We are Not Toronto. We are Not Hamilton. We are Not Oakville.
      It seems comparisons to other city’s is only use when it services the purpose of the day.

Friday, 3 April 2015

Bob Wood Special to Burlington Post
Burlington Post  |  3 hours ago
On the busesBurlington Mayor Rick Goldring was among members of council who accepted a challenge to ride city transit for five days in the same month.
Last Saturday’s transit users forum at the Central Library was structured differently than most public meetings you might attend.
Typically, you will find a roomful of charts and exhibits and staff ready to interpret the graphs and maps and answer your questions.
But this day belonged to the riders.
It was their day for input, according to Burlington for Accessible Sustainable Transit (BFAST), the organizers of the event.
The approximately 85 people attending had good opportunity to air their concerns. While four of the seven members of Burlington council and Burlington MPP Eleanor McMahon heard about what was wrong with public transit in the city; there was much that was positive articulated as well.
A short film called theBurlington Youth Transit Surveykicked off the morning, followed by a transit user panel. During the last portion of the forum, participants moved into small groups for discussions.
In the panel discussion a comment about the great work done by the bus drivers was met with applause. The prevailing attitude seemed to be that system shortcomings such as poor signage, inadequate shelters, poor communication and scheduling conflicts and gaps are not the fault of the drivers.

Panelist Glenna Cranston noted, for example, that keeping on tight schedules was difficult for the drivers particularly on some routes like  No. 10.
Cathie Pym was very pleased with the Handi-Van service that is used by people who, due to a functional limitation, cannot use the conventional system.
With some of the bad weather conditions this year, “no one else made it but Handi-Van,” she declared.
Another Handi-Van user, Paul Benson, prefers using the conventional system as it offers him more flexibility.  He uses Handi–Van occasionally.
He characterized his trips as “fairly successful, on most occasions.”
That’s because connecting with different routes and different systems — Benson often goes to Oakville for appointments — isn’t always easy.  
Enduring 40-minute waits, with riders sometimes forced to sit in unsheltered transfer locations, particularly in winter, poses such challenges for seniors and others that people may not go out. Social isolation may be a consequence.
 One panelist described how while attending a Realtor’s open house a bus drove by. On the spot she decided to buy the house because it was on that bus route.
That was 17 years ago. In 2013, however, that route (No. 4) was deleted. Users got together with Burlington Transit (BT) staff and “a really clever solution” to revise the route was fashioned.
Unfortunately, the solution was only effective for the morning rush hour. In the evening, riders often face 40-minute delays when transferring from the GO train to BT buses.
From youth, there was a concern that many young people want to continue to live in Burlington but may not be able to stay unless they can afford a car.
Longtime users of BT recalled how most routes use to run every 15 minutes and there was very little GO service. Today, GO trains are more frequent than BT buses and the percentage of travellers using public transportation has dropped from seven per cent to just under two per cent, commuter James Smith told the forum.
“It’s all about money,” said Smith. “We need to re-invest in transit.”
But Burlington appears to be going in the opposite direction.
Judy Goodings, who facilitated one of the discussion groups, reported that Burlington’s “spending per capita is 50 per cent less than other municipalities.”
All participants were asked to fill in comment sheets.
BFAST will be organizing the comments and putting a report together that will be forwarded to council and available to all who attended.
Earlier this year, BFAST had challenged the city’s mayor and councillors to spend five days in a month using Burlington’s transit system.
At the meeting BFAST Chair Doug Brown acknowledged those council members who had accepted the challenge.  
“You can’t really understand how the system works without getting on a bus,” said Brown.
 

Wednesday, 1 April 2015


Transit riders say what they think about the bus service: it isn't all bad but they make it clear it has to get better.

http://www.burlingtongazette.ca/?p=37698

By Pepper Parr
April 1, 2015
BURLINGTON, ON
It was the third in a series of transit meetings – this time it was the riders who were going to do the talking – and talk they did.  They packed the Centennial room at the library and told each other what worked and what didn’t work for them.
Transit - MMW + Sharman + Sydney
Six breakout groups took part in animated discussions on what works and what doesn’t work.
What was not surprising was the number of positive things the public had to say about the men and women who drive the buses – and the number of drivers who give students a break when the coins in their pockets don’t equal; the demand of the fare box.
However – it wasn’t all good news.
Transit wkshp = Edwardth = Mayor with cellJoey Edwardth, on the left isn’t sure the Mayor has it figured out. A newly converted transit advocate Mayor Goldring may have an issue he 
can run with.

Routes don’t work the way they need to work and the service is spotty much of the time.
When Bfast (Burlington friends for accessible transit) put out a challenge to the members of city council to use the bus one day a week for a month – Mayor Goldring took up the challenge and made a media event out of it. He has continued to use the bus since that kick off date for him
Councillor Marianne Meed Ward used the bus to get to a Regional Council meeting – she won’t be doing that again – close to three hours and $12+ in costs for what she says can be done in a fifteen minute car ride.
So far none of the other Councillors have taken the challenge – don’t hold your breath waiting for that to happen.

James Smith, a consistent transit advocate said he wasn’t able to take transit to get to the meeting: “the bus schedule wouldn’t allow me to do the errands I needed to do and get to the meeting on time”.
Transit - seniors with Gould
The public meeting for transit users broke out into different groups – these are the seniors talking about what the transit system does for them.
Smith was originally concerned that the politicians would take over the meeting – that didn’t prove to be the case.
Councillors Sharman, Craven, Meed Ward and the Mayor were on hand. The Mayor has clearly gotten the message – he has a new understanding of just what the transit problems are.
Meed Ward isn’t that much of a transit user – but then she lives and works in the downtown core and can walk to almost everything she is involved in.
Councillor Sharman didn’t look like he was enjoying himself and Councillor Craven just worked the crowd.
There was no one from Burlington Transit at the event. “They were invited”: said James Smith.
Transit MMW talking to group
Councillor Marianne Meed Ward explains a point to one of the breakout groups.
The much touted Presto pass can’t apparently be easily loaded – students found this a problem. The city had to spend a considerable amount of money to get the Presto pass service operational – it wasn’t an option and it wasn’t cheap.
The Burlington Transit system has 51 buses covering 31 routes. Coming up with a schedule that meets the needs of the ridership
has been a challenge and synchronizing the bus schedule with the GO schedule has been close to impossible. GO trains come and go more frequently than the buses.
Transit - shatrp lady grey hair + rings
A transit rider making a point.
One of the Bfast organizers pointed out that there is apparently no one at the transit office with a long, deep background in transit – and it shows.
Signage was also described as a problem;  especially when moving from the bus service to the GO service.
The biggest problem transit has is a lack of resources. The provincial gas tax rebate is devoted to transit in most municipalities – no so in Burlington. This city has a very significant infrastructure deficit and council has decided to repair the roads rather than improve the bus service.
And some of the roads are in close to desperate need of repair. The city’s namesake street – Burlington – is a mess. There are more people living on that street who drive cars and can complain than there are bus riders. And this city council knows how to listen to as few as a dozen complaints to make a change in a policy. They are certainly responsive – they need to work on being more responsible.
Transit will begin installing some technology that will provide them with real time information on how many people get on a bus and where they get off. It will cost millions – transit believes that with this data they can develop a schedule that will meet the needs of the bus riders.
Transit - group in breakouit
Everyone got an opportunity to tell their transit story – they weren’t all bad.
Doug Brown, a retired engineer has most of the information the city needs in filing cabinets in his basement. A tireless transit advocate, Brown surprisingly is not used or appreciated by many members of council or the people who run the transit system.


Brown does have a style that is unique to him – but he knows what he is talking about. He is a resource that should be tapped into.




Doug Brown, chair of Bfast, wants to see a bus schedule with routes that work for people and not the current bus route set up in place. It doesn’t work claims Brown.
The city no longer has a Transit Advisory committee. The one they did have consisted of had some people who should not have been at the table; they were uninformed, rude and interested only in advancing their personal agendas. There were a few that served well – just not enough of them.
 
Bfast is an organization the city might think of outsourcing the advisory role to – they have a wealth of talented, informed and committed people that can help make a difference.





Councillor Craven on the right explains a point to a transit users meeting participant while James Smith on the right looks on.

There should be a group of people who use the bus daily serving as a sounding board for the people who run the transit service.

Transit apparently doesn’t have a Twitter account – it does have a web site that more than does the job; it’s better than the city’s web site.

Burlington is reported to spend 50% less than comparable municipalities – and it shows.


Bfast Transit group logoBfast will produce a report once they’ve gone through the comments that came from the several breakout groups that were created.   Expected to be completed by the end of April, it will be a solid, fact based report.
Getting the response it needs from city council is not a given – however, the Mayor now has a better understanding of the needs and the problem.
Can he swing the minds of his colleagues? Don’t expect to see Councillors Sharman, Lancaster Taylor or Dennison becoming transit advocates – their focus is on repairing the roads.
The public is going to have to howl louder to get what the city needs. The squeaky wheel does get the grease.





Monday, 24 November 2014

Burlington slow to climb aboard transit

 http://www.thestar.com/news/city_hall/2012/04/12/burlington_slow_to_climb_aboard_transit.html

Even the mayor says he's frustrated by the lack of support for buses in the affluent, car-friendly community.

Burlington transit activist Doug Brown stands in front of a Burlington Transit bus stopped at the Appleby GO station. LIke many suburban cities, Burlington heavily subsizes its transit system.
DAVID COOPER / TORONTO STAR
Burlington transit activist Doug Brown stands in front of a Burlington Transit bus stopped at the Appleby GO station. Like many suburban cities, Burlington heavily subsidizes its transit system. 
 
"For the cost of running Burlington’s local bus service, the city could buy every one of its regular riders a book of cab chits, argues City Councillor Paul Sharman." (Emphasis is mine.)

It’s not that he’s anti-transit, says Sharman. It’s just that he’s not persuaded the heavy public subsidy for bus service in his affluent, car-centric community of 176,000 is justified.

He reckons that only about 4,000 people ride local buses every day and only 2 per cent of Burlington commuters use transit.

“We know for sure that 85 per cent of people in Burlington always only use cars. We have these big buses driving around. The seats are empty 90 per cent of the time. We’re spending $12 million a year — that’s $3,000 per rider,” he said.

While Brampton, Mississauga, Oakville and York have been branding their buses, adding express routes and touting their convenience, Burlington councillors like Sharman aren’t persuaded.

“It’s all very well to say, ‘We can change the world,’” said Sharman. “But we don’t need buses designed around a changed world. We need to have buses for the world we live in.”

It’s a frustration for Mayor Rick Goldring, who calls transit the dividing line on the seven-member council.

A new transit master plan is being developed to focus resources on the more heavily used routes and high-demand times, and Goldring is optimistic a new official plan will incorporate transit expansion.
But for now, he says, some Councillors are stuck on the classic suburban dilemma of little-used buses meandering long routes.

“We can’t go on this way,” said Goldring. “We need to get out of this funk we’re in about transit.”

“We’ve got to have the lively discussion and the dialogue, but we’ve got to move on. We’ve got to have some sort of consolidated view of where we’re going.”

Goldring admits, though, that there was no split in a recent council decision to devote more of Burlington’s $5 million in federal gas tax funding to road repaving this year.

Usually the money is split 70-30, with 70 per cent going to roads and 30 per cent to transit. This year, council voted for an 80-20 split, taking about $500,000 from transit capital, in a move that Goldring and city staff insist has no impact on transit this year.

Transit rider, environmentalist and anti-poverty activist Doug Brown says the money could have added another bus to Burlington’s fleet of 52. There may be some empty buses, but there are also some that are standing-room-only. Burlington’s per capita transit expenditure is one-third of other Toronto region municipalities, he said.

What really galls Brown, who owns a car but prefers the bus, is that the additional road upgrades will help repave parking lots and cul-de-sacs designed to discourage traffic and cripple the efficiency of local transit.

In the 1980s, 7 per cent of Burlington commuters used transit rather than a car, compared with 2 per cent now, he said.

“When you look at who our riders are, thre are a lot of seniors, a lot of youth, low-income people who can’t afford a car. We make it very difficult for these people to get around town. I think most citizens want us to be an inclusive community,” Brown said.

Burlington is late in confronting the urbanization of the Toronto region, says its former mayor, Walter Mulkewich.

“We’ve had a council that has not been particularly receptive to transit. They are adopting an attitude that transit has to pay for itself. They haven’t got a vision yet — or put the money to it,” said Mulkewich, who admits he should have done more to support the file when he was in power in the mid-1990s.

His mayoral successor, Rob MacIsaac, went on to become head of Metrolinx, the provincial agency charged with reducing congestion in the Toronto region.

Despite the mixed support, Burlington’s bus ridership is growing — about 7 per cent in the past year — with 2.1 million paying riders, said transit director Donna Shepherd.

Although most routes run only every half hour outside the rush periods, the Burlington bus fare is the same as the TTC, $3. Unlike the TTC, which recovers about 74 cents on the dollar at the fare box, Burlington only takes in 37 cents.

Burlington by bus
Population: 176,000
Revenue transit riders: 2.1 million last year — 7.3% increase over 2010
Fare: $3
Rate of return from fare box: 37-38%, compared with about 48% in Mississauga, 40% in York Region.
Ridership: Rose 21% over past 4 years, while population increased just over 6 per cent.
Commuters who use transit: 2%
Target for commuters using transit: 12% by 2031
Routes: 14, including GO specials
Frequency: Where warranted to GO stations and other commuter destinations, buses run every 15 minutes in peak hours; 30 minutes off-peak; hourly in late evening.
Dial-a-ride: Where residents live too far from a transit route, their fare buys them a taxi ride from their home to the nearest bus stop.
Annual service hours: 146,000

Sources: Burlington transit director Donna Shepherd, Burlington manager of community services Scott Steward, Toronto Star files

Tuesday, 18 November 2014

Online Voting Is Not Democratic

Democracy and Online Voting


  • Online voting may be convenient but it does not increase voter turnout.
  • It's not necessarily cost effective either. The Netherlands implemented a ban on Internet voting in 2009. It was costing them 90 euros per vote.
  • It's unfair to new candidates because it limits the time with which a new candidate can make themselves known.
  • Since online voting ends more than a week before election day, if there are any last minutes changes (such as a candidate withdrawing due to health matters etc.) or last minute revelations (a candidates criminal record is made public etc.) then the early voter is out of luck. I prefer to vote on the last election day.
  • Opaque, non-transparent voting can afflict voter lists, poll lists,vote counting and the chain of custody.
  • The system is non-transparent and its functions are hidden from the public.
  • Nothing is gained by having online voting and there is too much to lose.


The Voter Identification Card (V.I.D.)

I personally know of 3 people who received more than one Voter Identification Card (V.I.D.).  It’s not that unusual. A spouse has died or maybe there’s been a separation. Maybe an adult child has moved out of the family home but is still on the voter’s list. Maybe the former tenants V.I.D. Cards came to their old address and the new tenants now have their I.D.  I know of someone who received 3 V.I.C. with each card having a different spelling of his/her name. It would be difficult to vote more than once at the polls but you certainly could vote more than once online.

There are homes in which the head of the household rules the roost. That person could stand over their spouse and/or their voting age children to make sure they vote correctly thereby having control of more than just one vote.  I have no idea of what happens in institutions.



Purging The Voters List:

In the 2014 Municipal elections in Burlington, there was a purging of the voters list.  What was the criteria used for this purging?  Who decided and how was it decided who could be on the list and who was knocked off the list?  According to a Burlington Post letter, it was very difficult and time consuming for some voters to correct the errors.  



From: http://www.grassrootsonline.ca/online-voting-bad-idea/
Online voting is a bad idea for these 3 reasons: 
1. Denial of Service Attacks  
2. Nothing is unhackable, 
3. Verifying voter ID.

Denial of Service Attacks

The first reason is due to Distributed Denial of Service Attacks, also known as DDoS attack. A DDoS attack is an attack on a network that is designed to bring the network to its knees by flooding it with useless traffic. By doing this it basically cripples the website and doesn’t allow others to connect and interact with the website. Without access to the website in the case of online voting – people can’t vote. If people can’t vote, that’s a big problem. It means whomever is the winner of the election may not have actually won.
A recent DDoS Attack to come to mind is the NDP Leadership race in early 2013 where an online voting system was set up for ten of thousands of party members to elect their new leader. The company contracted to provide the service reported that it was an attack that came from “more than 10,000 “malevolent” IP addresses behind the “hundreds of thousands of false voting requests to the system.” The company claims that the system was not penetrated (meaning the data was not tampered with in the system), but it did slow down the voting process causing balloting for the leadership contest to be pushed back. With a set election date, for most general elections moving back a date is just not feasible and quite possibly not legal.

Nothing Is Unhackable

Another reason I believe that online voting is just not smart: nothing is unhackable. I don’t care how good of a web development team you have, there’s always a team that will one up you. It’s pretty simple to see by the recent events of major websites being maliciously hacked by various groups like Anonymous and the Syrian Electronic Army. There are a tonne of brilliant minds working on the internet – good and bad. With malicious hackers out there, it’s quite easy to understand that although the website may be built to be solid and secure, some hackers may still be able to penetrate the website. With online voting, if someone accesses the system, they gain full control of the election process and could potentially control the outcome of an election by manipulating the data.
In 2010, a group of students from the University of Michigan hacked into the online voting system for the city of Washington, D.C trying to prove a point that online voting was a terrible idea. The group accessed the site through its vulnerabilities and was able to take near full control due to a coding error. Once inside the system, the team of students noted “plenty of sloppiness, including unencrypted ballots left in a temporary directory and a publicly-accessible images directory”. The risk of a hacked system isn’t just a chance for politicians and their party to one up each other, but it’s also a breach of our privacy after casting our ballot. With this type of control taken by malicious hackers and the frequency of these cyber attacks on e-voting system increases, we lose complete control of the democratic process, defeating our right to have a fair election and voting for the candidate/party of our choice.

Lack Of Verification

Lastly, how do we ensure the people that are voting online are actually who they claim to be online. I understand that there are registration systems in place and that special pins can be mailed out to voters, but there’s no verification process. How do we ensure that the person who is sitting in front of the computer casting their online balloting is actually John Smith and not Sally Jones. Who’s to say Sally Jones couldn’t get her hands on John’s voter information and now is casting a fraudulent ballot? If the system is penetrated how do we know if a voter in the system is actually the legally registered voter? There is no way, other than verifying ballots cast with some type of follow up – which is just not feasible with thousands, and in some cases millions of voters. The only way to truly way to ensure that the voter is who they claim to be is with a piece of valid photo ID and a matching voter’s card. Although some would still argue that fraudulent voting could still occur, this method is by far the most controlled. It may be old school and not as efficient as we are used to in a technology-based society, but I believe that it’s the only way to ensure that the voting process is completely democratic.
Although people may disagree with my views and say that there are web developers and programmers that can pull off a solid and secure product for online voting, I will strongly argue that there are too many risks involved with casting an ballot online – and there’s always a better team of developers ready to one up the efforts of your team to accomplish their mission. Others will say that it will make it easier and encourage voters to cast that ballot by having an online voting system. My response? Politicians should engage more with citizens, include them in the policy making process and inspire them. Then you’ll see them at the polls.
If you truly want real democracy, online voting is bad idea! 


... there's their union boss or "friend" down the street, who just wants to "help" the voter cast their ballot and comes over to the house to "watch" them vote. Intimidation can be subtle, but if someone is watching to ensure you cast your ballot "correctly" you may not feel it's "worth it" to fight.

... That is to say, if the recent election in BC were conducted online, who would believe that the voters actually elected a Liberal Majority government, when the pundits predicted a easy win for the NDP?
http://www.grassrootsonline.ca/online-voting-bad-idea/


And lets not forget:

Burton v. Town of Oakville, Best, Mulvale & Serra, 2004 18068 (ON SC)

http://caselaw.canada.globe24h.com/0/0/ontario/superior-court-of-justice/2004/02/12/burton-v-town-of-oakville-best-mulvale-and-serra-2004-18068-on-sc.shtml
[4]       In his notice of application, Mr. Burton raises a number of concerns respecting the election.  A few of these issues relate to the use of vote-counting machines, but none impugns the use of these machines assuming that they are operational, in proper working order, and operated correctly.


My Unanswered Questions:

Who Has Control of the Machines and can he or she be "gotten to"?

How can I be absolutely sure my vote is recorded as I had intended?

Does the voters list stay in Canada or are these machines relaying info to another country?

Can someone walk away with all the voters info on a memory stick?

Why are we so quick to give up our democratic way of life?

Why would we want to give up the secret ballot?

Without a paper trail, how does anyone know that a vote cast will be recorded as intended? And, how would you conduct a ballot recount if it became necessary?




Sudbury “...proves digital ballots can be removed at will from virtual ballot boxes”
“Would you trust an election where...
1 A private company was hired to mark each ballot for the voters?
2 All ballots are counted in private?
3 No one, not even election officials, could watch the count?
4 No recounts are possible?
5 No independent audits are permitted to verify results?
   This is online voting!”


Comments
 
I just heard that the company who runs the Burlington voting machines, is the same one who was responsible for the debacle in NB this past election.

"My guess is that in Burlington voting machines have not helped increase turnout because the they have resulted in less polling stations meaning people have to travel further to vote."



Clever Anagram:
ELECTION RESULTS:
 When you rearrange the letters it becomes LIES - LET'S RECOUNT



"Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything."
   - Josef Stalin